🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Last month, WHO officials raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Potential consequences

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the legislation is approved.

International experts actually suggests a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass 65% of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill proposes sanctions for different infractions “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Via documentation, the managing director of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but asserts that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Critic response

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and harvest that and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the subsequent offspring while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Further, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to accomplish desired public health goals, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.